cut logo
           

GO


  •   Home
  •   About Us
    • About CUT...
    • Management
      • CUT Management
    • Contact Us
      • Job Opportunities
    • Vision 2020 and our Values
      • Vision, Mission and Core Values
      • The Leadership Charter
      • Going Beyond
      • Our History
      • Our Logo
    • Statistics
      • Stats-at-a-glance
    • Maps Bloemfontein
      • Campus Map
      • Directions to CUT
      • Satellite photo of CUT(Google Map)
    • Maps Welkom
      • Campus Map
      • Map to Campus
      • Satellite photo of campus(Google Map)
  •   Prospective Students
    • Study at CUT in 2013
    • Calendar 2013
    • Prospective Students
      • Financial Aid
      • Recognition of Prior Learning
    • Admission Information
      • Confirmation of Admission
    • Banking Details
    • Enrolments
    • Academic Exchange
    • Residence Life
    • SOAR/LEAD Programmes
    • Students with special needs
  •   Student Forms
  •   Current Students
    • Study at CUT in 2013
    • Calendar 2013
    • Governance and Student Life
    • Current Students
      • Assessment Rules & Regulations for 2010
      • Financial Aid
      • Recognition of Prior Learning
    • SRC
    • Workforce Development Centre
    • Center for Counselling
    • Student Mail
    • e-Thuto for WebCT
  •   Exams/Assessment
    • Examination Results
    • Student Progress Report
    • Assessment Section
    • Exam Timetable
    • Re-Exam Candidate Lists
    • Re-Assessment November 2015
  •   Partnership Projects
  •   Academia
    • Academic Support
      • Office of Technology Management
      • Unit of Academic Development
    • Faculties
  •   Alumni
    • Alumni Overview
    • Alumni Careers
    • Mission & Vision
    • Alumni Personnel
    • Alumni Adverts
    • Alumni Chapters
    • Alumni Documents
  •   News & Events
  •   Welkom Campus
  •   CUT Year Programme
  •   Medical Centre
  •   Research
    • 2011 Annual Report Research and Innovation
    • Library and Information Services
    • Annual Research Report 2011
    • Postdoctoral fellows - 4th Quarter 2012
    • Annual Research and Innovation Report 2009
    • Annual Research Report 2007
    • Annual Research and Development Report 2008
    • Research and Publications 2008
    • Research and Development Brochure 2009
  •   Vision 2020
  •   Strategic Execution Unit
  •   CUT/MHET
  •   Student Commentary on
          HE Amendment Bill




»  Annual Report

»  Conferences and Seminars

»  Job Opportunities

»  Library and Information Services

»  Units and Centers

»  Schools

»  New Facilities Development

»  Higher Education and Leadership Skills Academy (HELSKA)

»  Sustainable Development Project

»  STEPS Project

»  Tenders

»  Registration as Supplier



AMENDMENT BILL ON HIGHER EDUCATION LAWS IMPINGES INSTITUTIONAL AUTONOMY.

Fezile Sonkwane

Fezile Sonkwane
SRC Academic Officer

The ad-hoc amendments on the higher education and training laws bill have a serious potential of encroaching our universities and are in direct opposition to the supreme law of the Republic – the constitution. The ministry of higher education and training’s attempt to extend the minister’s role and intervention on public higher education institutions beyond the limitations imposed by the Higher Education Act currently can harm the academia. This is in view of the fact that universities are autonomous institutions that enjoy academic freedom.

For example the amendments include clauses which warrant the minister to appoint an administrator for “any other circumstances arising that may reveal financial or other maladministration of a serious administration or the serious of the effective functioning of the public higher education institution”.

Does this therefore mean that in a “circumstance” whereby disgruntled individuals or constituencies may level unsubstantiated allegations (irrespective of their validity) against the council or management of the university through anonymous letters for example, the minister would then have enough reasons to appoint an administrator?

What is also awkward with the amendments is the fact that justification for ministerial intervention in public higher education institutions goes far beyond financial mismanagement and dysfunctional governance structures.

The Council on Higher Education (CHE) opposes this more expressively in its submission to the portfolio committee of higher education on the amendment of the bill when it says that the clause “is broad, open-ended and does not specify what circumstances would justify the appointment of the administrator.” Not enough clarity has been provided to eloquently define what exactly “circumstances” is in this regard.

These amendments, if officially signed as an act by the president, could warrant autocratic and unlimited powers for the minister of higher education and training and this would unfortunately impinge institutional autonomy and academic freedom (which are enshrined in the bill of rights).

In Judge Johann Daffue's recent judgement in favour of CUT, he confirmed that "Universities in this country have a significant role to play and it is desirable that they enjoy their freedom and autonomy in their relationship with the state within the context of public accountability. The minister and his department must accept the autonomy of universities and should not be allowed to intervene in the affairs of a university unless the jurisdictional facts as set out in section 41A(1) have been shown to exist."

Again, if this becomes a law, university councils would be rendered ineffective hence some of the matters that they have to deal with would now be handled directly by the minister. As Justice Daffue mentioned in the case involving the CUT and the Minister of higher education and training that “one does not need a sledgehammer to kill a mosquito”. It is the prerogative of university councils to address matters that arise at a campus level (like the appointment and remuneration of vice-chancellors and principals for example) without any bullying or intimidation from the minister.

In its preamble, the higher education act 101 of 1997 puts particular emphasis on the fact that it is desirable to “respect and encourage democracy, academic freedom, freedom of speech and expression, creativity, scholarship and research”. I am of the view that should these amendments of the act go unopposed, then higher education in South Africa would be more politicised, less autonomous and interfered with. Therefore, the “respect” for academic freedom in particular would only be imaginary and absent.

South Africa’s community of academics and universities alike should join hands with the rest of South Africans to roundly reject these amendments hence they are unconstitutional.

The reason why the state has to be circumspect about interfering, intervening in, or controlling, universities is because one of the significant roles of universities in society is to pursue truth through conducting dispassionate enquiry. Academic freedom and institutional autonomy help to assure this. Without these guarantees, dispassionate enquiry becomes curtailed. Instead, universities may easily become obsequious mouthpieces of government. Through government fiat - no matter how subliminal - their research results may be forced to fit government's chosen narrative.

Fezile Sonkwane
SRC Academic Officer: Central University of Technology, Free State.

» log in

Student river rafting

Revue students

Students life


» Disclaimer
» Information Act
» Language Policy


Subscribe to me on YouTube


» 30 year Celebrations Photo Gallery
» Media Room

© Central University of Technology, Free State
last modified: 22 Feb 2013 03:59 PM
id:
last modified: 22 Feb 2013 03:59 PM
click to close

Central University of Technology | Engineering and Technology | Technology and Innovation | University of Technology Bloemfontein

The Central University of Technology in the Free State; thinking beyond with courses in engineering and technology.

Articles | SEO by Intoweb | Latest Press Releases